The National Math Improvement Project:

Harnessing the collective knowledge of district leaders to address core challenges in math instruction together.

NMIP’s Origin

Six of the nation’s largest urban school districts—Chicago Public Schools, Houston Independent School District, Los Angeles Unified School District, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, New York City Public Schools, and the School District of Philadelphia—have come together to form the National Math Improvement Project (NMIP).

NMIP districts collectively serve nearly 2.5 million students, the majority of whom are students of color and/or students living in poverty. While each district faces its own unique, local context and dynamics, the group shares challenges rooted in the sheer size and scale of their agencies, as well as the diverse student populations they serve.

Together, academic leaders from these districts have committed to collaborate over the course of three years through a community of practice focused on (1) implementing high-quality core and supplemental instruction and materials in math; (2) increasing educator capacity; and (3) building math mindset in students, educators, and society.

This project aims to elevate best practices and shared learnings in support of academic outcomes, educator capacity, and math mindsets. 

Core Challenges & Objectives 

NMIP convened informally for the first time in December 2022 in response to declining national test scores in math for students in grades 4 and 8. Throughout the early planning phase of the project, district leaders participated in a series of in-person and virtual workshops to identify their shared challenges related to teaching math. 

From 2023-2026, these leaders will join district peers, math experts, and practitioners for three annual convenings to address the five core challenges in math education the group has identified:

  • Size & Scale

    1. Size & Scale

    Challenge: Our systems are complex, representing the largest in the country, and the ability to implement and sustain systemic change requires time, resources, and planning at a unique scale.  

    The scale of math curriculum implementation is significantly more challenging when operating across hundreds of schools

    There are competing priorities within systems and math has received less attention in recent years 


    Objective for District Community of Practice:

    Developing effective communication across all stakeholders is necessary to not only build a shared understanding of efforts underway, but also to garner support and promote policies and practices that are sustained over time to improve math outcomes for all students within our districts. 

  • Core & Supplemental Materials

    2. Core & Supplemental Materials

    Challenge: Students do not have equitable access to high-quality instructional materials and effective instruction. 

    Selecting high-quality core and supplemental materials that are a good fit for our local context and that teachers, students, and families want to use is a delicate balance.

    The consistency of the student experience matters. For example, math materials used for core instruction compared to intervention or after-school tutoring might present a disconnected learning experience that hinders students’ acceleration.


    Objective for District Community of Practice:

    Share best practices from our districts to learn from one another and from experts about how to plan for instructional coherence in math, including alignment of core and supplemental materials.

  • Educator Capacity

    3. Educator Capacity

    Challenge: Our systems, both internal and external, are not designed to set up educators for success in teaching math. 

    Building the capacity of educators goes beyond professional learning for teachers. It is inclusive of teachers — current and future — and leaders across the education ecosystem. Many teachers are not sufficiently trained in mathematical pedagogy and best practices, and many lack the necessary resources and deep content knowledge necessary to support student numeracy and access to grade-level math content. Early-grade teachers, in particular, lack content knowledge, and there have been concerted efforts in early literacy that have not been mirrored for mathematics. 


    Objective for District Community of Practice:

    We will learn from one another and leading experts about promising practices for strengthening the capacity and expertise of teachers through sequenced, job-embedded supports to build content knowledge and pedagogical practices that improve math learning. We are working together to further our shared understanding of evidence-based instructional strategies tailored to diverse student populations, ensuring equitable access and engagement in math learning, including leveraging technology and personalized learning opportunities.

  • Leader Capacity

    4. Leader Capacity

    Challenge: School building leaders face competing priorities that include but don’t always prioritize instructional leadership in math.

    Anecdotally, we see many of our school leaders (i.e., principals) tend to have more comfort and experience in ELA instruction than in math, especially in the early years. Yet, they are responsible for the execution of and fidelity of math HQIM implementation.

    School leaders must also support their teachers’ instructional capacity-building, which means they need to build their own instructional capacity first.


    Objective for District Community of Practice:

    In addition to efforts related to educator capacity, we will also learn from one another and leading experts about promising practices for strengthening the capacity and expertise of leaders, including investigating successful models of math coaching at scale.

  • Math Mindset

    5. Math Mindset

    Challenge: Our system perpetuates the misguided belief that math is not for everyone which limits the potential of students, educators, and the future of society.

    There is a popularized narrative that math is not for everyone. This narrative inhibits the critical buy-in from educators, parents, and the community necessary for changing instruction in math. 


    Objective for District Community of Practice:

    By building upon mindset work from the Math Narrative Project and other researchers, our districts will be able to identify messages that resonate with stakeholders and share feedback with one another, evolving our messaging and approach together, including supporting sustained change management across our districts.

Districts

  • "LAUSD is on the forefront of implementation of HQIM with an explicit focus on meeting the unique needs of our nearly half a million students, no matter their background. Being a part of this community of practice with like-minded leaders in similar districts allows us to not only share in the challenge but support our collective agency to create sustainable systemic change.”

    Dr. Frances Baez, Chief Academic Officer, Los Angeles Unified School District

  • “Improving math education requires a commitment at all levels – national, state, and district – to design and implement policies that drive better outcomes. The National Math Improvement Project creates the space for leaders from all over the country to come together to discuss shared challenges and leverage their collective experience, which is a major step forward.”

    Dia Bryant, Lead Facilitator

  • “Our new materials represent a significant shift from what we are doing in the past and will require a significant change for our teachers. This is not an approach where the teacher stands in front of the classroom and … says ‘do step one, step two, step three.' Each of the districts in NMIP are pursuing similarly significant shifts and we greatly benefit from having dedicated time for the big picture and the specific next steps.”

    Dr. Nyshawana Francis-Thompson, Chief of Curriculum and Instruction, School District of Philadelphia

  • "As we navigate the complexities of implementing math HQIM across our district, the support and insights from our fellow NMIP members have been invaluable. We're not just changing materials; we're shifting mindsets and practices. This community allows us to learn from each other's success and challenges in order to better tackle common hurdles together, from professional development to community engagement, ensuring that our implementation is both robust and sustainable."

    Nalsy Perez, Executive Director of Professional Development, Houston Independent School District

  • "The National Math Improvement Project leverages one of the most powerful tools: compounding. In the financial world, your investment of dollars can compound and grow to offer you greater potential opportunities. The work of NMIP compounds the knowledge and leadership of six school districts to offer greater potential opportunities for over 2.5 million students."

    Pete Gorman, Lead Facilitator

  • “I am deeply moved by the passion, thoughtfulness, and collective expertise each of you brought to the space. Throughout our time together—from the school visits to the debriefs, expert panel, and our NMIP programming—I was reminded again and again that this work is not just about systems, it's about people. And each of you reminded me what it means to lead with heart, conviction, and a student-centered mindset.”

    Dr. Miatheresa Pate, Chief Academic Officer, New York City Public Schools

Resources

  • Report: Comparative Case Study on Algebra I Success

    January 2025: Read more about how three NMIP districts are leading the way in ensuring more students succeed on their first attempt at Algebra I.

    March 2025: ICYMI: Webinar recording exploring how districts are reducing systemic barriers to advanced math education and improving Algebra 1 readiness and outcomes. Presenters included: Dr. Corey Morrison, Director of Mathematics, Chicago Public Schools (IL); Dr. Frances Baez, Chief Academic Officer, Los Angeles Unified School District (CA); Hillary Knudson, Vice President, Whiteboard Advisors; and Dr. Dia Bryant, NMIP Lead Facilitator, Context Matters Strategy Group

  • In the News

    How 3 districts are turning algebra from ‘Gatekeeper’ to ‘Gateway’: K-12 Dive — February 26, 2025

    Read a reflection on a chance meeting and the birth of the National Math Improvement Project from NMIP Lead & Whiteboard Advisors Co-founder Anna Edwards.

    Most Schools Can’t Define “High-Quality” Math Materials: Gallup’s survey of education leaders revealed a major barrier to improving instruction and student outcomes in math. Hillary Knudson and Thomas Rodgers share what you need to know.

Events